Sleuth BreakPlay
A city street in 1898 with horse-drawn carriages
True case · New York City and Newark · 1898

The Bromo Seltzer Christmas gift

On Christmas Eve 1898 a parcel reached Harry S. Cornish at the Knickerbocker Athletic Club in New York: a Tiffany box, a silver bottle holder and a blue bottle of what looked like bromo seltzer, with no card. Four days later a dose of it killed Katharine J. Adams.

Want to solve it yourself?

Work the case from the same records before you read how it ended. Free, in your browser.

Play the case

At a glance

When
December 23–28, 1898
Where
New York City and Newark, New Jersey
Poison
Cyanide of mercury, in a bottle labeled bromo seltzer
Record
People v. Molineux, 168 N.Y. 264 (1901)

Timeline

  1. A silver bottle holder is bought at Hartdegan & Co.’s store in Newark, New Jersey.

  2. The package is mailed at the New York general post office in the afternoon.

  3. Cornish receives it at the club. The gift-card envelope inside is empty.

  4. Mrs. Adams takes a dose for a headache and dies. Cornish, who tasted it, falls ill.

From the record

The address on the wrapperMr. Harry Cornish, Knickerbocker Athletic Club, Madison Avenue and Forty-fifth St., New York City.Statement of facts · People v. Molineux, 168 N.Y. 264
The tastewhy that stuff is all rightCornish to Mrs. Adams, December 28 · People v. Molineux
Show who was tried (spoils the game)

A package was mailed at the New York general post office on the afternoon of December 23, 1898, addressed to Harry S. Cornish at the Knickerbocker Athletic Club. It contained a Tiffany box, a silver bottle holder, an empty card envelope, and a blue bottle labeled as bromo seltzer. The bottle’s contents were bromo seltzer mixed with cyanide of mercury. Cornish brought it home; Mrs. Adams took a dose for a headache, collapsed, and died. Cornish drank part of the same glass and became ill.

Molineux was convicted at trial, but in 1901 the New York Court of Appeals reversed the judgment of conviction and ordered a new trial. The judges divided in part over the Barnet evidence, though all agreed in the disposition that the conviction could not stand as entered. At his second trial in 1902, an historical fact outside this appellate record, Roland B. Molineux was acquitted. His legal guilt therefore was not finally settled by the record used here.

Sources

People v. Molineux, 168 N.Y. 264 (1901)New York Court of Appeals opinion, statement of factsNewspaper reports, 1898Library of Congress, Chronicling America↗

Lines marked “reconstructed” restate the court’s summary in the form of the original document; they are not facsimiles.

More from 1898